Savard, Bergevin and Quebec Players: Numbers Don’t Lie

By JD Lagrange – Since retiring, Hall of Famer and former Canadiens’ general manager Serge Savard hasn’t been shy about telling everyone what he thinks of the situation when asked about his old team. For journalists, Savard is a candy because he says what he thinks and, let’s face it, he has some credibility. After all, he’s the last general manager to bring Lord Stanley to the NHL’s most successful franchise, and he did it twice, in 1986 and 1993. But sometimes it feels like “the Senator” likes to hear himself talk and what he says does not always hold water. This is particularly true when he talks about the French Canadian players of the Canadiens.

Savard is a close friend of the Molson family and Geoff Molson hired him as a personal consultant when the team was looking for a General Manager in the spring of 2012. It was he who helped Molson choose Marc Bergevin as the position back then. But when it comes to language, the former number 18 choses to criticize Bergevin’s work for the lack of Quebecers on the team. Indeed, he once said during an interview at RDS “5 à 7”, that he had warned Bergevin of the importance of scouting Quebec players.

“I told him, but I guess he didn’t listen. I told him that people will let him win in English, but they won’t let him lose in English…” – Serge Savard

Serge Savard

For many more pragmatic people, like yours truly, such statements did not sit well. It seems like the landscape has changed since the mid-80s, mid-90s and today. Until now, I had no solid numbers to base it on. We knew that there are more teams today. But upon doing extensive research, I realized how unrealistic, unfair, and frankly out of touch with reality Savard’s comments were. To be fair, I doubt he knows how unrealistic he is, but here are the facts. Believe it or not, I present only a small portion of the research that I have done, as I don’t want to bore you with numbers. But it all goes in the same direction.

The Canadian Hockey League

The CHL is made up of the three major junior hockey leagues in Canada: the Western Hockey League (WHL), the Ontario Hockey League (OHL) and the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League (LHJMQ). For a long time, these three leagues were only for players born in Canada. Then all three leagues changed their rules allowing “outsiders”, or “imports”.

Today, each CHL team is allowed to dress and play a maximum of two foreign players each season, who are selected each year through the CHL Import Draft process. There are 60 teams in the CHL: 22 in the WHL, 20 in the OHL and 18 in the QMJHL. Therefore, this means a total of 120 foreign players across Canada. And because of that, 120 Canadian children cannot play and develop in the best junior leagues in their own country! No wonder someone as patriotic as Don Cherry is upset about this situation.

Additionally, the NHL is scouting more overseas and at American colleges than ever before. More American teams in the NHL means more Canadian-born players playing in the United States and having children there, who then in turn are playing hockey in the United States. All of these factors contribute over time to the decline in the number of Canadian-born players in the National Hockey League, even without accounting for imports. If I had pushed the reflection further, there would be even fewer Canadian players drafted, because these imported players are often high level talents (Ex: Artemi Panarin).

Before looking at the numbers, I separated them into two epochs. Savard was General Manager of the Canadiens from 1983 to 1995, while Bergevin has been general manager at Montreal since 2012, so his last selection was in 2021. Here are two obvious facts:

  1. There are more teams in the NHL now than in Savard’s day
  2. There are fewer Draft rounds to allow a team to select

I took the number of rounds per year under each GM, added them up and averaged them. I did the same for the number of teams, hence the fractions. Without further ado, let’s look at some numbers, shall we?

# of Rounds# of Teams% Draft Ratio/Round *CHL % Picks
1983-199511.5422.464.4544.12
2012-2021730.53.2841.59
Difference-4.54+8.04-1.17-2.53
*1 / # of Teams

Between 1983 and 1995, each team had 4 and a half more draft rounds than between 2012 and 2021. There were approximately eight more teams in the NHL between 2012-2021 than between 1983-1995. That’s eight more teams talking ahead of you for the next round, eight more players selected between each of your picks, eight fewer players available… each round. In the seventh round of today’s Draft, that’s more than 50 fewer players who were available for your team when it’s their turn to speak.

League by league

Now, let’s take a look at the performance of each of the three leagues individually.

CHL Drafted% OHL% WHL% QMJHL
1983-199543.7837.3518.88
2012-202141.4435.0523.54
Difference-2.34-2.30+4.66

Oh look, the QMJHL percentage has gone up! Good news, right? Wait…

The QMJHL and Quebecers

These QMJHL numbers don’t tell the whole story. You see, since the discussions are not about the number of players selected in the QMJHL, but rather the number of Quebecers selected by the Habs, I went further in my study. Let’s look at all players selected in this league and remove foreign players. I also removed players from the Maritimes who are not French-speaking. Yes, it was a lot of work (and research), but I didn’t want to do things halfway. So here is what I found…

Quebecois% Drafted of CHL% Drafted Overall# per TeamOdds of Drafting one *
1983-199515.977.0410.510.31%
2021-202113.405.573.900.18%
Difference-2.57-1.47-6.61-0.13%
Quebecois specific table
* % of Quebecois (of all drafted players) / # of teams

The percentage of Quebecers has dropped by more than 2.5%. What does that mean ? This means that the arrival of more European and American players in the QMJHL distorts the statistics of the league. More Europeans play and are selected in the QMJHL by NHL teams, but fewer Quebecers. This means that the QMJHL produces far less local talent in Quebec. In addition, there were almost seven fewer Quebecers per team between the two eras. That’s per team folks, not just on the Habs.

Conclusion

So, Mr. Savard… here is a summary of my research, which I compiled for you, yes, but also for the small group of politically motivated individuals in Quebec, who are going after the Canadiens and their current CEO for, according to them, failing to exercise due diligence in choosing local products.

  • Bergevin had four fewer rounds than Savard to choose players.
  • There were eight more teams under Bergevin than under Savard, so eight more teams choose between each selection.
  • The number of CHL players has dropped considerably since Savard.
  • There are fewer Quebecers drafted in the entire NHL than ever before (not just the Canadiens).
  • There are fewer Quebecers in the NHL than in Savard’s time, in the entire league.
  • The chances of drafting a Quebecer under Bergevin had almost decreased by 40% since the days of Savard (0.31% to 0.18%).

Want to point a finger at a culprit? Perhaps we should take a more informed approach and point the finger at the QMJHL instead. I would go even further and say that Hockey Quebec is doing a terrible job of not providing the talent needed to power the Q as well. The problem, Mr. Savard and company, is NOT Bergevin and the Canadians. It is up to the QMJHL and Hockey Quebec to work hand in hand to help promote young players to return to the game. And it is up to these leagues to ensure the proper development of these young men with a good ratio practice/game and better coach education, focusing on skills rather than systems for winning games. The odds will always be worse than they were under Savard, but at least there will be more choice, which is not the case today.

There is a glimmer of hope for the QMJHL and the Canadiens though, as Hockey Quebec has a very good man at the helm now in Jocelyn Thibault, and it looks like the 2022 Draft is rather promising… although not at the very top, but depth-wise at least. We shall find out.

More reading…

[Video] Lafleur Talks About Lemaire And Savard

By JD Lagrange – We all knew that Guy Lafleur didn’t retire as a Montreal Canadiens under his own terms. We all suspected that the main reason for him making this hasty decision was because of his former teammate turned head coach Jacques Lemaire. What many of us didn’t know was how Serge Savard and Jacques Lemaire treated the team’s biggest name and that, folks, is very disappointing to learn.

In an interview with Paul Arcan a few years ago, Lafleur opened up on the circumstances leading up to his first retirement and the way he left the Canadiens.

Here are a few quotes from his interview…

“These guys when they were given the jobs, Lemaire and Savard, their first goal was to get rid of the players with whom they had played with. The first one to leave was Steve Shutt, the second one was me, then it was Larry [Robinson].”

“When you’re going to training camp, the first year Jacques Lemaire started as head coach, I was on the ice an hour before anyone else. I was sitting on the bench and Lemaire came to see me. The first question, the first meeting I have with him as head coach, he said: ‘With the salary you’re getting (explicit), I hope you’re not going to slack off this year.’ I looked at him and said: ‘Do you want to go (explicit)?’ That’s how it started.”

Lafleur had this to say on the way he made the decision to retire from the Canadiens:

“I knew that they were playing with my mind when they weren’t playing me. It was keeping me up at night. So I went and talked to them and had a good discussion. So I was told: ‘Yes, we’ll play you. We’ll put you on two lines, you’ll kill penalties, you’ll play on the power play’. I told them that it wasn’t what I was asking for, I just wanted some reasonable ice time so that I can get rolling. They said it wasn’t a problem. That night, I played five minutes.”

“That’s when I asked the policeman, after the second period, to go get Serge Savard. I told him that my decision was made, my career was over. The team was heading to Boston that night. The only guy I told it was over was Larry Robinson. As I was walking in the hallway after the game, Serge yelled at me to come over. I was expecting he’d want to talk to me about my decision… he simply said: ‘What are we going to tell the reporters?’ I said: ‘Tell them whatever the (explicit) you want! I’m (explicit) out of here!’ And I left.”

I don’t know about you but I have lost a lot of respect for both Lemaire and Savard with this story. For Savard, it started when he started criticizing Bergevin for the number of Québécois on the team, not taking circumstances into consideration, like the number of QMJHL players in the league. Now, the less I hear about “the Senator” or “Coco”, the better it will be. And notice that neither was at Lafleur’s tribute on Sunday…

More reading…